Hall & Briscoe, Inc. v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hall & Briscoe, Inc. v. Roberts

1933 OK 182, 20 P.2d 188, 163 Okla. 12, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 600

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1933

Docket23604

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1933 OK 182 (Hall & Briscoe, Inc. v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall & Briscoe, Inc. v. Roberts, 1933 OK 182, 20 P.2d 188, 163 Okla. 12, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 600 (Okla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

OÚLLISON, Y. C. J.

This case is a companion case of cause No. 23603, this day decided by this court. 163 Okla. 11, 20 P. (2d) 186. In the case at bar, plaintiffs instituted suit seeking to recover from defendant for medical expenses, hospital expenses, and other expenses incurred by them in caring for Harley Strode as a result of the accidental injury which is the basis of cause No. 28603. This case was consolidated with and tried with cause No. 23603. The law applicable to case No. 23603 is applicable to the case at bar, and is conclusive of the questions of law raised herein. Relying upon the authority of said ease this day decided, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

Defendants in error pray that judgment be rendered upon a supersedeas bond filed herein, and in compliance with said request, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of defendants in error against plaintiff in error as principal, and its surety, Western Casualty & Surety Company, as surety, for the amount of the principal judgment of $795, with interest and costs in accordance with the tenor of the judgment rendered in said cause.

RILEY, C. J.. and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAYLESS. BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., concur.

Note. — See under (1) 14 R. C. L. 817 et seq., R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 3683; R. C. L. Pocket Part, title “Instructions,” § 76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OÚLLISON, Y. C. J.

This case is a companion case of cause No. 23603, this day decided by this court. 163 Okla. 11, 20 P. (2d) 186. In the case at bar, plaintiffs instituted suit seeking to recover from defendant for medical expenses, hospital expenses, and other expenses incurred by them in caring for Harley Strode as a result of the accidental injury which is the basis of cause No. 28603. This case was consolidated with and tried with cause No. 23603. The law applicable to case No. 23603 is applicable to the case at bar, and is conclusive of the questions of law raised herein. Relying upon the authority of said ease this day decided, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

Defendants in error pray that judgment be rendered upon a supersedeas bond filed herein, and in compliance with said request, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of defendants in error against plaintiff in error as principal, and its surety, Western Casualty & Surety Company, as surety, for the amount of the principal judgment of $795, with interest and costs in accordance with the tenor of the judgment rendered in said cause.

RILEY, C. J.. and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAYLESS. BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., concur.

Note. — See under (1) 14 R. C. L. 817 et seq., R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 3683; R. C. L. Pocket Part, title “Instructions,” § 76.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1933 OK 182, 20 P.2d 188, 163 Okla. 12, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-briscoe-inc-v-roberts-okla-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack