Halkmon v. Boeing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Halkmon v. Boeing Co.

302 S.W.3d 702, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1708, 2009 WL 4639517

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 2009·No. No. ED 92363·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Halkmon, the claimant in this unemployment-compensation case, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that Mr. Halkmon was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits following his discharge from employment at The Boeing Company. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(4) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Halkmon, the claimant in this unemployment-compensation case, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that Mr. Halkmon was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits following his discharge from employment at The Boeing Company. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(4) & (5).

Halkmon v. Boeing Co., 302 S.W.3d 702, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1708, 2009 WL 4639517 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 702 (Halkmon v. Boeing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.