Halkitis v. New York City Department Of Education

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 18, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-11753·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------- x ROBERT M. HALKITIS, STIPULATED Plaintiff, CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND -against- PROTECTIVE ORDER NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; 19 Civ. 11753 (JMF) DONALDA CHUMNEY, JENNIFER REHN- LOSQUARDO, LINDSAY OAKES, LISA STEFANICK, COURTNEY DELANEY and YASMEEN GUTIC, Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------------------- X WHEREAS, plaintiff has sought certain documents and information from Defendants New York City Department of Education (“DOE”), Donalda Chumney, Jennifer Rehn-Losquardo, Lindsay Oakes, Lisa Stefanick, Courtney Delaney and Jasmina Gutic s/h/a Yasmeen Gutic (collectively, “defendants”) in discovery in this action, which defendants deem confidential and/or highly confidential; and WHEREAS, defendants object to the production of confidential material unless appropriate protection for its confidentiality is assured; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for plaintiff and defendants, as follows: Confidential Information In General 1. As used herein, “Confidential Information,” means any information of any type, kind or character which is designated “Confidential” by the supplying party, whether it be a document, information contained in a document, information revealed during a deposition, information revealed in an interrogatory answer, information revealed during a court proceeding or otherwise. In designating information as “Confidential,” a party will make such designation only as to that information that it in good faith believes contains confidential information. Use of Confidential Information In General

2. Neither the parties, nor their attorneys or anyone else receiving such Confidential Information as provided herein shall use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than for the preparation or presentation of plaintiff’s case in this action. 3. Neither plaintiff nor his attorneys shall disclose Confidential Information to any person except under the following conditions: a. Disclosure before trial may be made only to (i) plaintiff’s counsel’s staff, (ii) an expert who has been retained or specially employed by counsel for the plaintiff in anticipation of litigation or preparation of this action (including consulting experts), (iii) a witness at deposition (as provided for below), (iv) the Court (as provided for below), (v) at the summary judgment stage or (vi) at the trial (or another hearing) of this action (as

provided for below), wherein for all cases the disclosure of such information is deemed necessary to the investigation of the matters relevant to this action, presentation of such testimony, or the legal issues pertinent to this action; b. Disclosure to an individual not listed in subparagraph 3(a) above may be made only upon granting of an application to the Court, and for good cause shown. In the event a conflict arises between the parties as to whether a party may show Confidential Information to an individual not listed in subparagraph (a) above, the receiving party agrees not to do so until such time as the parties can obtain a ruling from the Court in this regard; and c. Before any disclosure is made to a person listed in subparagraph 3(a) above (other than to the Court), plaintiff’s counsel shall provide each such person with a copy of this Stipulation and Protective Order, and such

person shall consent in writing, in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A, not to use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than in connection with the preparation, presentation or defense of this case and not to further disclose the Confidential Information except in testimony given in this case. The signatory shall further agree to waive any objection, jurisdictional or otherwise, to the exercise by the Court of its power to enforce the terms of this Order by such means as the Court deems appropriate. The signed consent shall be retained by the applicable attorney and a copy shall be furnished to opposing counsel upon request.

Any consent forms signed by consulting experts may be redacted upon disclosure to the supplying party’s attorneys. 4. Confidential Information shall not be copied or reproduced except for use in this action, and shall not be copied or reproduced for use in this action except to the extent such copying or reproduction is reasonably necessary to the conduct of this action, and all such copies or reproductions shall be subject to the terms of this Order. If the duplicating process by which copies or reproductions of Confidential Information are made does not preserve the confidentiality designations that appear on the original documents, all such copies or reproductions shall be stamped "CONFIDENTIAL" as appropriate. All copies or reproductions of Confidential Information shall be kept under the control of the persons described in paragraph 3. Designation of Confidential Information In General

5. Material (including responses to Interrogatories and court filings) shall be designated as “Confidential” by placing or affixing on such material a “CONFIDENTIAL” notice, or, in the case of materials to be produced for inspection, or testimony, otherwise identifying them as “Confidential Information.” 6. Any such notice which is inadvertently omitted during document production or inspection may be corrected by prompt written notification to counsel. 7. Deposition or hearing testimony may be designated as “Confidential Information” by an appropriate statement on the record at the time when such testimony is given or upon subsequent written notification to counsel upon review of the transcript. 8. Deposition exhibits and exhibits to Court filings which are deemed

“Confidential Information” shall be so designated by stamping the exhibit accordingly. 9. Any portion of a transcript or exhibit designated as “Confidential” shall be separately bound and the “CONFIDENTIAL” designation shall be marked conspicuously on the cover. 10. If designation occurs after receipt of the transcript, then each party shall attach a copy of such written statement to the face of the transcript and each copy thereof in its possession, custody or control. To the extent required to be consistent with the provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order, persons not entitled to have access to Confidential Information may be excluded from any proceeding where it is being discussed. Disputes 11. If anyone objects to discovery materials being considered Confidential Information, the Party shall state the objection by letter to counsel. If the Parties are unable to

resolve the objection, any Party may move the Court for an Order that the challenged information does not qualify as Confidential Information. Until the Court rules on the objection, the disputed information shall be treated as Confidential Information. Depositions 12. Persons attending virtual depositions taken in this action at which Confidential Information or any information contained therein is identified, discussed or disclosed shall be limited to the Parties, the court reporter, the deponent, counsel for the deponent, counsel for the Parties and any representative of the Parties who are bound by the

terms of this Stipulation and Confidentiality Agreement and such other persons identified herein. If any Confidential Information is to be used during the virtual deposition of a non-Party witness, the deponent shall be given a copy of the Consent Form prior to the virtual deposition, advised that he or she is bound by the terms thereof, and requested to sign the Consent Form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halkitis v. New York City Department Of Education, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Halkitis v. New York City Department Of Education (Halkitis v. New York City Department Of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)