Halkedis v. TWO E. END AVE. APARTMENT CORP.

New York Court of Appeals

Halkedis v. TWO E. END AVE. APARTMENT CORP.

72 N.Y.2d 933

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 72 N.Y.2d 933 (Halkedis v. TWO E. END AVE. APARTMENT CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halkedis v. TWO E. END AVE. APARTMENT CORP., 72 N.Y.2d 933 (N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

72 N.Y.2d 933 (1988)

Theodore Halkedis et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Two East End Avenue Apartment Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Rockrose Development Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 13, 1988.

George Stiefel and Scott Claman for appellant.

Linda C. Goldstein and Thomas H. Moreland for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (137 AD2d 452).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 N.Y.2d 933 (1988)

Theodore Halkedis et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Two East End Avenue Apartment Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Rockrose Development Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 13, 1988.

George Stiefel and Scott Claman for appellant.

Linda C. Goldstein and Thomas H. Moreland for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (137 AD2d 452).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 N.Y.2d 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halkedis-v-two-e-end-ave-apartment-corp-ny-1988.

Opinion

Theodore Halkedis et al., Plaintiffs, v. Two East End Avenue Apartment Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Rockrose Development Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Theodore Halkedis et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Two East End Avenue Apartment Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Rockrose Development Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.