Halim v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners
This text of 556 F. App'x 262 (Halim v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ahmad Halim appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims of age, religion, and national origin discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Halim v. Balt. City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:1 1-cv-02265-WMN, 2013 WL 5487814 (D.Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 F. App'x 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halim-v-baltimore-city-board-of-school-commissioners-ca4-2014.