Haliburton v. State

842 So. 2d 950, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4443, 2003 WL 1627623
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 2003·No. No. 4D02-4125·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed as untimely filed. Rehearing does not toll the time to appeal the denial of an order on a rule [951]*9513.800(a) motion. See King v. State, 754 So.2d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

POLEN, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haliburton v. State, 842 So. 2d 950, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4443, 2003 WL 1627623 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

842 So. 2d 950 (Haliburton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
911 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)