Haliburton v. Florida
135 S. Ct. 178, 190 L. Ed. 2d 8, 83 U.S.L.W. 3183, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 5799
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 6, 2014
DocketNo. 13–10790.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 135 S. Ct. 178 (Haliburton v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haliburton v. Florida, 135 S. Ct. 178, 190 L. Ed. 2d 8, 83 U.S.L.W. 3183, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 5799 (U.S. 2014).
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisand petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Hall v. Florida,572 U.S ----,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Frank A. Walls v. State of Florida – Corrected Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida, 2017
Frank A. Walls v. State of Florida
213 So. 3d 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
In re: Warren Lee Hill, Jr.
777 F.3d 1214 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 178, 190 L. Ed. 2d 8, 83 U.S.L.W. 3183, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 5799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haliburton-v-florida-scotus-2014.