Halfpenny v. F. & D. Co.
This text of 172 A.D. 897 (Halfpenny v. F. & D. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant the submission to the jury of the width of the [step on which plaintiff fell as a question or specification of negligence, and that the evidence was not sufficiently clear to warrant the jury in finding that the doors, if open folded, as defendant evidently designed them to be, would be a proximate cause of the accident, and that this defendant is not hable for the negligence of the lessee in leaving such doors open beyond the half exposed when folded. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D. 897, 156 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halfpenny-v-f-d-co-nyappdiv-1915.