Halfman v. Frank

Indiana Supreme Court

Halfman v. Frank

62 Ind. 212

DecidedMay 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ind. 212 (Halfman v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halfman v. Frank, 62 Ind. 212 (Ind. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Biddle, J.

Complaint by the appellees, against the appellants, to recover judgment on two promissory notes, and to subject certain real estate, alleged 4o have been fraudulently conveyed, to sale, for the purpose of paying the judgment. Trial by the court; finding and judgment for the appellees.

The appellants introduced no evidence at the trial, but have here presented •two questions : Pirst, the insufficiency of the complaint; second, the insufficiency of evidence.

The complaint is good, and the evidence is sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant's, and ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biddle, J.

Complaint by the appellees, against the appellants, to recover judgment on two promissory notes, and to subject certain real estate, alleged 4o have been fraudulently conveyed, to sale, for the purpose of paying the judgment. Trial by the court; finding and judgment for the appellees.

The appellants introduced no evidence at the trial, but have here presented •two questions : Pirst, the insufficiency of the complaint; second, the insufficiency of evidence.

The complaint is good, and the evidence is sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant's, and ten per cent, damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Ind. 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halfman-v-frank-ind-1878.