Haley v. State
170 S.W.3d 429, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 479, 2005 WL 701289
This text of 170 S.W.3d 429 (Haley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haley v. State, 170 S.W.3d 429, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 479, 2005 WL 701289 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
ORDER
Jack Haley, Jr. appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, after an eviden-tiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Belton v. Smoky Hill Railway & Historical Society, Inc.
170 S.W.3d 429 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 S.W.3d 429, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 479, 2005 WL 701289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haley-v-state-moctapp-2005.