Haley v. State

679 S.W.2d 886, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 5116
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 1984·No. No. WD-34774·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from a denial of relief requested by him under Rule 27.26. The [887]*887findings of fact by the trial court are not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears, and an opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haley v. State, 679 S.W.2d 886, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 5116 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

679 S.W.2d 886 (Haley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samuel E. Haley v. Bill Armontrout
924 F.2d 735 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)