Haley v. Cook

Missouri Court of Appeals

Haley v. Cook

560 S.W.3d 1

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 17, 2018

DocketWD 80838

StatusPublished

This text of 560 S.W.3d 1 (Haley v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haley v. Cook, 560 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellant Doris Haley, as next friend for her son Marcus Haley, appeals the Circuit Court of Saline County's grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Respondent Steve Cook (individually and doing business as Pizza Hut Hut Hut Team Camp). In her lawsuit, Doris Haley sought damages for injuries which Marcus Haley suffered during a summer football camp which was organized by Cook. On appeal, Doris Haley argues that the circuit court erroneously granted summary judgment to Cook, because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether Cook had *2breached a duty owed to Marcus Haley by failing to have qualified referees officiating at the camp's scrimmages; whether Cook's breach of duty proximately caused Marcus Haley's injuries; and whether Marcus Haley had assumed the risk of injury associated with participation in the football camp. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellant Doris Haley, as next friend for her son Marcus Haley, appeals the Circuit Court of Saline County's grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Respondent Steve Cook (individually and doing business as Pizza Hut Hut Hut Team Camp). In her lawsuit, Doris Haley sought damages for injuries which Marcus Haley suffered during a summer football camp which was organized by Cook. On appeal, Doris Haley argues that the circuit court erroneously granted summary judgment to Cook, because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether Cook had *2breached a duty owed to Marcus Haley by failing to have qualified referees officiating at the camp's scrimmages; whether Cook's breach of duty proximately caused Marcus Haley's injuries; and whether Marcus Haley had assumed the risk of injury associated with participation in the football camp. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 S.W.3d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haley-v-cook-moctapp-2018.