Hales v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of Hales v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Hales v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
************************* BEVERLY HALES, * No. 21-1575V * Petitioner, * * Special Master Christian J. Moran v. * * Filed: June 11, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************
Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner; Mitchell Jones, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1
On June 11, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Beverly Hales on July 14, 2021. Petitioner alleged that the influenza vaccine she received on October 30, 2018, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused her to suffer from left facial nerve palsy. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.
Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged injury, or any other injury, and further denies that petitioner’s current disabilities are sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted in the website. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
Damages awarded in that stipulation include:
A lump sum of $30,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hales v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hales-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.