Hales v. National Land Exchange
This text of 219 N.C. 651 (Hales v. National Land Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The consent judgment, in so far as it pertained to the sale of the land, was an interlocutory order in the cause, and has validity because of the approval of the judge, and was subject to modification by [652]*652the judge like any other such order, provided it did not infringe upon the rights of the parties. See Fowler v. Winders, 185 N. C., 105, 116 S. E., 177. Compare Coburn v. Comrs., 191 N. C., 68, 131 S. E., 372.
No encroachment upon rights of parties appears. Hence, the judgment will be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 N.C. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hales-v-national-land-exchange-nc-1941.