Hale v. Worstell
96 N.Y.S. 1127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hale v. Worstell. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 N.Y.S. 485 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1905·Published
Opinion
We think there was power at the Special Term to make the order appealed from, but that the discretion was not judiciously exercised in this case. No injury can occur by respecting the judgment of the Special Term and of this court pending the appeal to the Court of Appeals, and it does not appear to us as a proper case for suspending its operation. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. See 95 N. Y. Supp. 485.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hale v. Worstell, 96 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
96 N.Y.S. 1127 (Hale v. Worstell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hale v. Worstell
95 N.Y.S. 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)