Hale v. Woodruff
4 Blackf. 184, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 27
This text of 4 Blackf. 184 (Hale v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hale v. Woodruff, 4 Blackf. 184, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 27 (Ind. 1836).
Opinion
HELD, that the president and trustees of New-Albany were not authorised, by the act of incorporation of 1832, to extend the limits of the corporation so as to include the out-lots of the town, without the consent of a majority of the resident owners of such lots.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Blackf. 184, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-woodruff-ind-1836.