Hale v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hale v. State

187 S.E. 603, 54 Ga. App. 204, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 491

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 11, 1936

Docket25706

StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.E. 603 (Hale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hale v. State, 187 S.E. 603, 54 Ga. App. 204, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky. His motion for new trial contained the usual general grounds only; and the evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of his guilt. The eases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are differentiated by their facts from this case.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky. His motion for new trial contained the usual general grounds only; and the evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of his guilt. The eases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are differentiated by their facts from this case.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 S.E. 603, 54 Ga. App. 204, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-state-gactapp-1936.