Hale v. State
183 S.E. 107, 52 Ga. App. 307, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 150
This text of 183 S.E. 107 (Hale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hale v. State, 183 S.E. 107, 52 Ga. App. 307, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 150 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
Tne defendant was convicted of simple larceny. The evidence, although wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based on the usual general grounds only.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
183 S.E. 107, 52 Ga. App. 307, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-state-gactapp-1935.