Hale v. State

486 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 863, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7222
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1986·No. No. 85-705·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. Appellant was given a sentence pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines for a crime which occurred before the effective date of those guidelines. Because appellant did not affirmatively elect to be sentenced under the guidelines, we quash the sentence and remand for resentencing. Irving v. State, 464 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Hart v. State, 464 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

UPCHURCH, J., concurs. SHARP, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hale v. State, 486 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 863, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

486 So. 2d 93 (Hale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. Wirth
49 So. 3d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Coulson v. State
970 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)