Hale v. State
This text of 2013 Ark. 470 (Hale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2013 Ark. 470
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-13-499
Opinion Delivered November 14, 2013
BILLY RAY HALE PRO SE MOTION FOR APPELLANT APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND MOTION TO FILE BELATED REPLY v. BRIEF, 39CV-13-12 [LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 39CV-13-12, STATE OF ARKANSAS HON. L.T. SIMES, JUDGE] APPELLEE
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL GRANTED; MOTION TO FILE BELATED REPLY BRIEF MOOT.
PER CURIAM
Appellant Billy Ray Hale has lodged an appeal in this court from an order of the circuit
court denying his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. Now before us are appellant’s pro
se motions for appointment of counsel and to file a belated reply brief. We find good cause
to grant the motion for appointment of counsel and appoint Misty Borkowski. Our clerk is
directed to set a new briefing schedule for the appeal. As counsel has been appointed, the
motion to file belated reply brief is moot.
Motion for appointment of counsel granted; motion to file belated reply brief moot.
Billy R. Hale, pro se appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ark. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-state-ark-2013.