Hale v. O'Connor Coal & Supply Co.

181 F. 267, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5507
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
DecidedJune 15, 1908
DocketNo. 591
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 F. 267 (Hale v. O'Connor Coal & Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hale v. O'Connor Coal & Supply Co., 181 F. 267, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5507 (circtdct 1908).

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

Starting with the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in City of Atlanta v. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipeworks, 127 Fed. 23, 61 C. C. A. 387, 64 L. R. A. 721, as the foundation, this complaint has been examined at leisure and with due care. If any doubt could have been entertained after reading the words of the distinguished writer in that case, it has, to my mind, been dissipated by the later expressions delivered by the higher federal courts.

As things now stand, it would be flying in the face of the higher powers, with a vengeance, to accept as valid any of the criticisms launched against the complaint. If the facts therein alleged can be sustained by proof, a case will be presented which will invoke the aid of a federal, rather than a state, court. The situation is so absolutely one-sided as to satisfy me that no good purpose would be subserved by an extended discussion and citation of authorities.

Let the demurrers, one and all, be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frohlich v. Deacon
148 N.W. 180 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 F. 267, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-oconnor-coal-supply-co-circtdct-1908.