Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.
This text of 228 A.2d 217 (Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, remitting the record in a workmen’s compensation case to the Board for additional findings of fact.
Although orders of this character are generally considered interlocutory, Wilk v. The Budd Company, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 100 A. 2d 127 (1953), we are not without power to review them. Barber v. Fleming Raugh, Inc., 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 230, 222 A. 2d 423 (1966); Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Company, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 460, 69 A. 2d 192 (1949).
After thorough and independent study, we are of the opinion that the record before us is sufficient to permit the lower court to decide the case on the merits. The order of the lower court is therefore reversed, and the record is remanded to it for that purpose.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.2d 217, 209 Pa. Super. 298, 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-metalweld-inc-pasuperct-1967.