Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hale v. Messineo

Hale v. Messineo

140 A.D.2d 410, 528 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 140 A.D.2d 410 (Hale v. Messineo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hale v. Messineo, 140 A.D.2d 410, 528 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Because the statements made by the defendant in her complaint to the New York City Police Department Civilian Complaint Review Board are protected by an absolute privilege (see, Magnus v Anpatiellos, 130 AD2d 719), the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs request for disclosure of these statements (see, Cirale v 80 Pine St. Corp., 35 NY2d 113, 117; Matter of Weinberg, 129 AD2d 126; Hoffman v Ro-San Manor, 73 AD2d 207). Weinstein, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cirale v. 80 Pine Street Corp.
316 N.E.2d 301 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Hoffman v. Ro-San Manor
73 A.D.2d 207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
In re Beiny
129 A.D.2d 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Magnus v. Anpatiellos
130 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 410, 528 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-messineo-nyappdiv-1988.