Hale v. Manchester & Keene Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hale v. Manchester & Keene Railroad

61 N.H. 641

DecidedDecember 5, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 61 N.H. 641 (Hale v. Manchester & Keene Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hale v. Manchester & Keene Railroad, 61 N.H. 641 (N.H. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

All the objections now presented to the confirmation of the sale were equally objections to ordering the sale, and it must be presumed that they were either not presented, or, if presented, were considered and overruled. By the decree ordering the sale the defendants are concluded upon all matters which were or might have been urged against that decree.

jExceptions overruled.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter, J.

All the objections now presented to the confirmation of the sale were equally objections to ordering the sale, and it must be presumed that they were either not presented, or, if presented, were considered and overruled. By the decree ordering the sale the defendants are concluded upon all matters which were or might have been urged against that decree.

jExceptions overruled.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.H. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-manchester-keene-railroad-nh-1881.