Hale v. . Huggins
This text of 1 N.C. 671 (Hale v. . Huggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Resolved, that where the words of the statute were that the plaintiff shall have no more costs than damages, etc., in an action, etc., begun andprosecuted, etc., and the action was commenced before the Parliament andprosecuted afterwards. The plaintiff shall have no more costs; although a man is said to prosecute an original writ when he begins. But it was answered that the prosecution is after the commencement. Therefore, etc.Sandal's case, antea, p. 632.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-huggins-kingsbench-1793.