Hale v. Higgins

1 N.C. 58

This text of 1 N.C. 58 (Hale v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hale v. Higgins, 1 N.C. 58 (circtnc 1793).

Opinion

RESOLVED, that where the words of the statute, were that the plaintiff shall have no more costs than damages &c. in an action &c. begun and prosecuted &c. and the action was commenced before the Parliament and prosecuted afterwards. The plaintiff shall have no more costs; although a man is said to prosecute an original writ, when [59]*59he begins. But it was answered that the prosecution is after the commencement. Therefore &c. Antea p. 2. Sandal's case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-higgins-circtnc-1793.