Hale v. Heyser

1 How. Pr. 220
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 220 (Hale v. Heyser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hale v. Heyser, 1 How. Pr. 220 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

It appeared that no subsequent proceedings had been had in the cause.

Beardsley, Justice.

Denied the motion without costs, on the ground that the service being irregular, it was of no effect. There was no subsequent proceedings had to be affected by it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-heyser-nysupct-1845.