Hale v. Hale

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hale v. Hale

885 S.W.2d 788, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610, 1994 WL 565603

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1994·No. No. 64654·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant, John M. Hale (“husband”), appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dismissing his motion to modify that portion of his dissolution decree relating to child support and child custody. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellant, John M. Hale (“husband”), appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dismissing his motion to modify that portion of his dissolution decree relating to child support and child custody. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Hale v. Hale, 885 S.W.2d 788, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610, 1994 WL 565603 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

885 S.W.2d 788 (Hale v. Hale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.