Hale v. Crosby
921 So. 2d 9, 2005 WL 1183770
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 2005
Docket1D05-1454
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 921 So. 2d 9 (Hale v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hale v. Crosby, 921 So. 2d 9, 2005 WL 1183770 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
William HALE, Petitioner,
v.
James V. CROSBY, Jr., Sec., Fla. Dept. of Corrections and Joseph Thompson, Warden at Florida State Prison, Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
William Hale, pro se, petitioner.
Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Hollingsworth v. Szczecina, 731 So.2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
ERVIN, PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hale v. McNeil
988 So. 2d 1123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
921 So. 2d 9, 2005 WL 1183770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2005.