Hale v. Afro-American Arts International, Inc.

436 S.E.2d 588, 335 N.C. 231, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 556
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 3, 1993
Docket291A93
StatusPublished
Cited by38 cases

This text of 436 S.E.2d 588 (Hale v. Afro-American Arts International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hale v. Afro-American Arts International, Inc., 436 S.E.2d 588, 335 N.C. 231, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 556 (N.C. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the Court of Appeals on its own motion dismissed defendants’ appeal after the record on appeal had been served on the appellee and docketed without objection in the Court of Appeals and after all briefs had been duly filed. The basis for the dismissal was that while the record on appeal contained the proper notice of appeal, “[n]othing in the notice . . . shows that plaintiff was given notice of the appeal through service as required by [Appellate] Rule 26(b).” 110 N.C. App. 621, 623, 430 S.E.2d 457, 458. The majority concluded that this was a jurisdictional defect which both the parties and the court were powerless to remedy.

Judge Wynn, dissenting, concluded that failure to serve the notice of appeal was a defect in the record analogous to failure to serve process. Therefore, a party upon whom service of notice of appeal is required may waive the failure of service by not raising the issue by motion or otherwise and by participating without objection in the appeal, as did the plaintiff here. Judge Wynn concluded that plaintiff had thereby waived service of the notice of appeal and that the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of the appeal and should consider the case on its merits.

For the reasons given in Judge Wynn’s dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals dismissing defendants’ appeal and remand the case to that court for consideration on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crenshaw v. Crenshaw
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2024
In re: A.N.B.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2023
State v. Hawkins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
In re K.D.C.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2020
In re J.S.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2020
State v. Gantt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020
State v. Golder
805 S.E.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
In re B.N.M.
798 S.E.2d 816 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Tuwamo v. Tuwamo
790 S.E.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
State v. Glasco
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015
In re C.V.M.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
State v. Williams
761 S.E.2d 662 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
State v. Rowe
752 S.E.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Nolen
743 S.E.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Gerald
742 S.E.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Ragland
739 S.E.2d 616 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
MNC Holdings, LLC v. Town of Matthews
735 S.E.2d 364 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
Lee v. WINGET ROAD, LLC
693 S.E.2d 684 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
In re S.F.
198 N.C. App. 611 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Mcquillin v. Perez
657 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 S.E.2d 588, 335 N.C. 231, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-afro-american-arts-international-inc-nc-1993.