Haldeman v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co.

466 A.2d 1193, 143 Vt. 647, 1983 Vt. LEXIS 511
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJuly 20, 1983
DocketNo. 82-543
StatusPublished

This text of 466 A.2d 1193 (Haldeman v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haldeman v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co., 466 A.2d 1193, 143 Vt. 647, 1983 Vt. LEXIS 511 (Vt. 1983).

Opinion

The Chittenden Superior Court’s order of October 26, 1982, denying the plaintiff’s V.R.C.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment, is affirmed.

Plaintiff’s motion does not seek a vacation of the prior judgment, nor a new trial on all the issues. Rather, he requests to keep what he has secured — to have a further hearing where he can seek additional damages, without relitigating liability. V.R.C.P. 60(b) does not afford such relief. See Smith v. Smith, 139 Vt. 234, 427 A.2d 378 (1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Smith
427 A.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 A.2d 1193, 143 Vt. 647, 1983 Vt. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haldeman-v-metropolitan-petroleum-co-vt-1983.