Haldeman v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co.
This text of 466 A.2d 1193 (Haldeman v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Chittenden Superior Court’s order of October 26, 1982, denying the plaintiff’s V.R.C.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment, is affirmed.
Plaintiff’s motion does not seek a vacation of the prior judgment, nor a new trial on all the issues. Rather, he requests to keep what he has secured — to have a further hearing where he can seek additional damages, without relitigating liability. V.R.C.P. 60(b) does not afford such relief. See Smith v. Smith, 139 Vt. 234, 427 A.2d 378 (1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 A.2d 1193, 143 Vt. 647, 1983 Vt. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haldeman-v-metropolitan-petroleum-co-vt-1983.