Halbert v. First Realty Services, Inc.

504 So. 2d 431, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 602, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7145
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 1987·No. No. BK-425·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment entered pursuant to a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff below (First Realty Services, Inc.) regarding an exclusive right to sale clause in a real estate contract. We reverse.

If there is room for difference among reasonable men as to existence of a material fact sought to be established or as to a material inference which reasonably might be drawn from established facts, the case should be submitted to the jury. Miami Coin-O-Wash, Inc. v. McGough, 195 So.2d 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

Upon review of the record, we find that the ambiguous testimony of Mr. Halbert (defendant below) would support a jury finding that the real estate contract had been modified such that a nonexclusive right to sale existed.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., and J. LEWIS HALL, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halbert v. First Realty Services, Inc., 504 So. 2d 431, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 602, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

504 So. 2d 431 (Halbert v. First Realty Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KIWANIS CLUB v. De Kalafe
723 So. 2d 838 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Pierre v. Oriente Sugar Cane Planting, Inc.
504 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)