Halas v. Town of Boothbay

556 A.2d 665, 1989 Me. LEXIS 94
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedApril 14, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 556 A.2d 665 (Halas v. Town of Boothbay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halas v. Town of Boothbay, 556 A.2d 665, 1989 Me. LEXIS 94 (Me. 1989).

Opinion

[666]*666MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Monica Halas and Robert O’Connor appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, (Lincoln County, Chandler, J.), affirming a decision of the Boothbay Zoning Board of Appeals that had, in turn, affirmed a decision of the Boothbay Planning Board. The Planning Board granted Paul Morissette a permit to perform modifications to a building known as the Forest House. The Planning Board determined that a grandfathered, non-conforming use of the Forest House had not been discontinued for a period of twelve calendar months. The question before us is limited to whether the decision was arbitrary, unlawful or unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. Camden and Rockland Water Co. v. Town of Hope, 543 A.2d 827, 829 (Me.1988). Review of the record reveals substantial evidence to support the Board’s factual finding and no arbitrary or unlawful action.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Camden & Rockland Water Co. v. Town of Hope
543 A.2d 827 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 A.2d 665, 1989 Me. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halas-v-town-of-boothbay-me-1989.