Hala Tashin Issa v. Helmi Bashar Abboushi

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 6, 2022
Docket14-22-00594-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Hala Tashin Issa v. Helmi Bashar Abboushi (Hala Tashin Issa v. Helmi Bashar Abboushi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hala Tashin Issa v. Helmi Bashar Abboushi, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order filed October 6, 2022

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-22-00594-CV ____________

HALA TASHIN ISSA, Appellant

V.

HELMI BASHAR ABBOUSHI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 344th District Court Chambers County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-28984

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 3, 2022. Appellant timely filed a post judgment motion.1 The notice of appeal was due August 1, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on August 12, 2022, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed 1 Appellant filed a premature request for findings of fact and conclusions law which served to extend the appellate deadline to 90 days. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4), 27.2; Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.258. within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we order appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant fails to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Associates, Ltd.
974 S.W.2d 805 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hala Tashin Issa v. Helmi Bashar Abboushi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hala-tashin-issa-v-helmi-bashar-abboushi-texapp-2022.