Hako-Med USA, Inc. v. Bailey

489 F. App'x 425
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 14, 2012·No. No. 11-14251·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kai Hansjurgens, a creditor proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his appeal of the bankruptcy court’s interlocutory order finding him liable on Donald Bailey’s related claims, pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 8009(1)(1). This Court does not have to decide whether the district court abused its discretion by dismissing Hansjurgens’s appeal for want of prosecution because he never received leave to appeal the bankruptcy court’s interlocutory order. And the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying such leave where the bankruptcy court had by then entered a final judgment. The district court did not have jurisdiction to consider Hansjurgens’s claims. We affirm the district court’s order dismissing his appeal to that court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hako-Med USA, Inc. v. Bailey, 489 F. App'x 425 (11th Cir. 2012).

489 F. App'x 425 (Hako-Med USA, Inc. v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kai Hansjurgens v. Donald H. Bailey
90 F.4th 1158 (Eleventh Circuit, 2024)