Haka v. Mecklenburg County

Fourth Circuit

Haka v. Mecklenburg County

474 F. App'x 263

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2012·No. No. 12-1619·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Haka appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haka v. Mecklenburg Cnty., No. 3:12-cv-00100-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Haka appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haka v. Mecklenburg Cnty., No. 3:12-cv-00100-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Haka v. Mecklenburg County, 474 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 263 (Haka v. Mecklenburg County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.