Hajosch v. Patterson

558 So. 2d 529, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2068, 1990 WL 33511
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 1990·No. No. 88-3434·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants raise two points, the first of which is dispositive. We conclude the trial court erred in granting a new trial, the question whether the plaintiff had suffered a permanent soft-tissue injury being one for the jury. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to enter final judgment in accordance with the verdict.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hajosch v. Patterson, 558 So. 2d 529, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2068, 1990 WL 33511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 529 (Hajosch v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crowley v. State
558 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)