Hajosch v. Patterson
558 So. 2d 529, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2068, 1990 WL 33511
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 1990
DocketNo. 88-3434
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 558 So. 2d 529 (Hajosch v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hajosch v. Patterson, 558 So. 2d 529, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2068, 1990 WL 33511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
Appellants raise two points, the first of which is dispositive. We conclude the trial court erred in granting a new trial, the question whether the plaintiff had suffered a permanent soft-tissue injury being one for the jury. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to enter final judgment in accordance with the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crowley v. State
558 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
558 So. 2d 529, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2068, 1990 WL 33511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hajosch-v-patterson-fladistctapp-1990.