Hajny v. Smedes
This text of 233 A.D. 724 (Hajny v. Smedes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that at the time of commencement of action it does not satisfactorily appear that plaintiff was a resident of New York county, and that the venue should be changed for the convenience of witnesses. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hajny-v-smedes-nyappdiv-1931.