Hajizada v. USCIS
This text of Hajizada v. USCIS (Hajizada v. USCIS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JALAL HAJIZADA, Case No. 24-cv-02688-CRB
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL 10 v.
11 U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), 12 et al.,
13 Defendants.
14 Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. Dkt. 10. Accordingly, under 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the action is DISMISSED without 16 prejudice. See Am. Soccer Co. v. Score First Enters., 187 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 1999) 17 (plaintiff’s “absolute right” to dismiss his action voluntarily before defendants serve 18 answer or motion for summary judgment leaves no role for court to play). 19 The clerk is directed to close the case. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: January 3, 2025 CHARLES R. BREYER 22 United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hajizada v. USCIS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hajizada-v-uscis-cand-2025.