Haise v. Lorch

47 Miss. 685
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Peyton, C. J.:

This is a writ of error prosecuted from an order of the circuit court of Hinds county, granting a new trial.

A writ of error lies only from a final order or decree, except in cases specially authorized by statute. Higginbottom v. Shall, 3 S. & M. 588 ; Terry v. Robbins, 5 ib. 291 ; Stebbins v. Neles, 13 ib. 307 ; Delworth v. Fooshee, 34 Miss. 288.

Hence a writ of error will not lie where exceptions are taken to a judgment granting a new trial, until after a new trial has been had and a final judgment rendered. Bank of Lexington v. Taylor, 2 S. & M. 27 ; Terry v. Robbins, 5 ib. 291.

The writ of error, having been improperly sued out in this case, must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haise v. Lorch, 47 Miss. 685 (Mich. 1873).

47 Miss. 685 (Haise v. Lorch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf & Ship Island Railroad v. Williams
68 So. 776 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)