Hairston v. State
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of burglary and aggravated assault on a police officer. Held:
1. The court charged the jury: "The defendant’s plea of not guilty is no evidence of his innocence.” On appeal defendant states that this charge "caused a shifting of the burden of the proof upon appellant . . .” and thereby violated due process. The charge is a correct statement of law and cannot be construed as being an impermissible burden shifting charge.
2. The evidence authorized the convictions of the offenses charged in the indictment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
235 S.E.2d 657 (Hairston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.