Hairston v. State
This text of 235 S.E.2d 657 (Hairston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of burglary and aggravated assault on a police officer. Held:
1. The court charged the jury: "The defendant’s plea of not guilty is no evidence of his innocence.” On appeal defendant states that this charge "caused a shifting of the burden of the proof upon appellant . . .” and thereby violated due process. The charge is a correct statement of law and cannot be construed as being an impermissible burden shifting charge.
2. The evidence authorized the convictions of the offenses charged in the indictment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 S.E.2d 657, 142 Ga. App. 235, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hairston-v-state-gactapp-1977.