Hairston v. Scism

181 L. Ed. 2d 7, 132 S. Ct. 383, 565 U.S. 806, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6244, 80 U.S.L.W. 3193
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 2011
DocketNo. 11-5188
StatusPublished

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 7 (Hairston v. Scism) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hairston v. Scism, 181 L. Ed. 2d 7, 132 S. Ct. 383, 565 U.S. 806, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6244, 80 U.S.L.W. 3193 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 130.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. William Scism
423 F. App'x 130 (Third Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 7, 132 S. Ct. 383, 565 U.S. 806, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6244, 80 U.S.L.W. 3193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hairston-v-scism-scotus-2011.