Hairston v. Medley
1 Va. 96
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hairston v. Medley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Gratt. 96 →
Opinion
Affirm the decree.
By the reporter. The court did not state the ground on which the decree was affirmed; but the reporter understood that they considered that the decree of 1826 was a mere nullity as to Henry Hairston: that the second suit was a continuation of the first: and that the exhibits in the first suit satisfactorily established the claim of the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hairston v. Medley, 1 Va. 96 (Va. 1844).
1 Va. 96 (Hairston v. Medley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.