Home/Supreme Court/Hairston v. Idaho

Hairston v. Idaho

128 S. Ct. 1442, 552 U.S. 1227
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 25, 2008
Docket07-5634
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 128 S. Ct. 1442 (Hairston v. Idaho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hairston v. Idaho, 128 S. Ct. 1442, 552 U.S. 1227 (U.S. 2008).

Opinion

(2008)

JAMES H. HAIRSTON
v.
IDAHO

No. 07-5634

Supreme Court of United States.

February 25, 2008.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Idaho for further consideration in light of Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. ___ (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hairston v. State
Idaho Supreme Court, 2020
Stuart v. State
232 P.3d 813 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2010)
Rhoades v. State
233 P.3d 61 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S. Ct. 1442, 552 U.S. 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hairston-v-idaho-scotus-2008.