Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Hairston v. Harward

Hairston v. Harward

808 S.E.2d 759
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hairston v. Harward. Read the opinion of the Court — 371 N.C. 647 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 22, 2018·No. 416A17-1·Published

Opinion

Ann C. Ochsner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

*760Huntington M. Willis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Deborah J. Bowers, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

Andrew Pinto, Attorney at Law, Greensboro.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 16th of January 2018 to Amend the Case Caption:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of January 2018."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hairston v. Harward, 808 S.E.2d 759 (N.C. 2018).

808 S.E.2d 759 (Hairston v. Harward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.