Hairston v. Cole

Supreme Court of Virginia

Hairston v. Cole

1 Va. 461, 1 Rand. 461

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedMay 15, 1823

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 1 Va. 461 (Hairston v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hairston v. Cole, 1 Va. 461, 1 Rand. 461 (Va. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

May 20.

Judge Brooke,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The statement in the bill of exceptions, that a manuscript purporting to be a copy of an act of the General As[462]*462semUy of Virginia, entitled an act, &c. is too imperfect to enable the court to pronounce any opinion thereon, it not being stated that the said copy was authenticated, and how authenticated, nor is the said manuscriptsetout in the bill .-of exceptions. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May 20.

Judge Brooke,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The statement in the bill of exceptions, that a manuscript purporting to be a copy of an act of the General As[462]*462semUy of Virginia, entitled an act, &c. is too imperfect to enable the court to pronounce any opinion thereon, it not being stated that the said copy was authenticated, and how authenticated, nor is the said manuscriptsetout in the bill .-of exceptions. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Va. 461, 1 Rand. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hairston-v-cole-va-1823.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack