Haire v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Haire v. State

982 S.W.2d 669, 336 Ark. 48, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 4

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 7, 1999

DocketCR 98-1438

StatusPublished

This text of 982 S.W.2d 669 (Haire v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haire v. State, 982 S.W.2d 669, 336 Ark. 48, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 4 (Ark. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Darrell Lamar Haire, by his attorney, William O. James, Jr., has filed a motion for

rule on the clerk. Mr. James admits in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Darrell Lamar Haire, by his attorney, William O. James, Jr., has filed a motion for

rule on the clerk. Mr. James admits in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

982 S.W.2d 669, 336 Ark. 48, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haire-v-state-ark-1999.