Haire v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Haire v. State

982 S.W.2d 669, 336 Ark. 48, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 4

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haire v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 340 Ark. 11 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 7, 1999·No. CR 98-1438·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Darrell Lamar Haire, by his attorney, William O. James, Jr., has filed a motion for

rule on the clerk. Mr. James admits in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Darrell Lamar Haire, by his attorney, William O. James, Jr., has filed a motion for

rule on the clerk. Mr. James admits in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Haire v. State, 982 S.W.2d 669, 336 Ark. 48, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 4 (Ark. 1999).

Pincite

982 S.W.2d 669 (Haire v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.