Hair v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hair v. State

120 S.E. 35, 31 Ga. App. 177, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 820

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 15, 1923

Docket14939

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 35 (Hair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hair v. State, 120 S.E. 35, 31 Ga. App. 177, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 820 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon. His motion for a new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only, was overruled. The evidence was in conflict, but the jury believed, as they had a right to do, the evidence of the State, which authorized the defendant’s conviction. The trial judge approved the verdict. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon. His motion for a new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only, was overruled. The evidence was in conflict, but the jury believed, as they had a right to do, the evidence of the State, which authorized the defendant’s conviction. The trial judge approved the verdict. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 35, 31 Ga. App. 177, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hair-v-state-gactapp-1923.