Hair v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hair v. State

503 So. 2d 449, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 721, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12011

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 4, 1987

DocketNo. 86-3252

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 503 So. 2d 449 (Hair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hair v. State, 503 So. 2d 449, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 721, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12011 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, appellant contends we should grant relief because the trial court, based solely on a finding that appellant violated his probation, bumped his recommended guidelines sentence up more than one cell. His failure to seek appellate review of such an error precluded the trial court from consideration of the issue. Affirmed. Rowe v. State, 496 So.2d 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, appellant contends we should grant relief because the trial court, based solely on a finding that appellant violated his probation, bumped his recommended guidelines sentence up more than one cell. His failure to seek appellate review of such an error precluded the trial court from consideration of the issue. Affirmed. Rowe v. State, 496 So.2d 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 So. 2d 449, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 721, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hair-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack