Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2026·No. 1D2025-0678·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-0678

RALPH MONROE HAIR,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, et al.,

Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Proceedings.

June 24, 2026

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Strong v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 916 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“As the Florida Parole Commission subsequently restored petitioner to supervision, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied as moot.”).

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Ralph Monroe Hair, pro se, Petitioner.

Mark Hiers, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review (Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strong v. Florida Parole Commission
916 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)