Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
This text of Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review (Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-0678 _____________________________
RALPH MONROE HAIR,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, et al.,
Respondents. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Proceedings.
June 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Strong v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 916 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“As the Florida Parole Commission subsequently restored petitioner to supervision, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied as moot.”). LEWIS, ROBERTS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Ralph Monroe Hair, pro se, Petitioner.
Mark Hiers, Deputy General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hair v. Florida Commission on Offender Review, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hair-v-florida-commission-on-offender-review-fladistctapp-2026.